Sun, Feb 23, 2014
CEOs SHARE CULTURE INITIATIVES
My last blog laid out the context for leading culture change and gave a few examples of CEO initiatives to lead the way. Here is a more complete list based on both private client conversations and Vistage CEO peer advisory group discussion:
- Hire a talent manager for development of high potentials
- Make culture change a major project for the senior team with accountabilities for the cascade to lower levels
- Make culture a specific topic in exit interviews
- Get 360s done on senior team and next level and include culture questions (on- line and in supplemental interviews by HR or third party)
- Town hall meetings with open Q&A
- Put culture into goal deployment top down
- Change physical things to encourage collaboration (take walls down, move, etc.)
- Consolidate small groups into big groups and report out and measure as a group
- Give recognition for sharer of best practice to others
- Change names of things so people are one
- Make sure there are consequences of action without consultation or collaboration (stop project, deny funding, communicate examples of the right way and the not right way)
- Hire for culture fit at all levels (senior team participates in senior hires)
- Lunch n learn monthly by CEO with randomly selected people
- Use the lunch n learn (or breakfasts) to enlist a “listening system” of people who will report issues the CEO needs to hear
- Ask direct reports to develop their own listening systems
- Engage administrative department people on projects across functions and across other divides (e.g., administrative and academic)
- Form a non-executive committee (“Associates Committee” and/or Managers’ Committee” – AC or MC)Initialize by CEO message as to purpose and freedom
- Observe (or ask about) emerging leaders on the AC or MCDelegate problems to AC and/or MC
– Encourage them to bubble problems and recommended solutions or process improvements up to senior team
- Let the committee deal with non-strategic operational problems that affect employees
- Broadly communicate thinking behind decisions by Sr Team
- Identify and groom culture carriers in different parts of the organization
- Encourage culture carriers to be close, a community
- Put real effort into a culture campaign…
- Communications cascade down to lower levels on mission and values
- CEO participates (sometimes) in associates committee meetings and
- Raffle off 2 hours of CEO time to work with an associate (“above covers boss”)
- Seminar with CEO teaching 25 employees each month on basics
Questions about the spirit and/or the detail of the above are invited.
Thu, Feb 20, 2014
A huge transition is under way in how customers buy products and services. The customer landscape is shifting from inside-out (company to prospect) to outside-in (knowledgeable buyer seeks satisfaction). It will require major transformations of organizations, cost structures, accounting and more.
Most of my clients are “old school,” regardless of age. In the sense I mean it, this is a compliment: leading by example, valuing ethics, hard work, collaboration and more.
Most of my clients are also “old school” when it comes to sales and the dependence of the enterprise on that function. That is not a compliment.
Why not? Because the customer landscape is shifting from inside-out (company to prospect) to outside-in (knowledgeable buyer seeks satisfaction).
Both Sam Bowers’ (Vistage speaker) workshop and Jim Blasingame’s new book set a great table for a crucial conversation inside any company — references provided at end of this post.
THESIS: TWO VERY DIFFERENT CUSTOMER SEGMENTS
Many companies (many industries) now have two customer segments: (1) those who buy based on value and relationships and (2) those who buy primarily on price for “good enough” alternatives. Good enough may include competing options that are highly specific and truly different. But price will determine the outcome of the final decision.
The difference between the segments? The second set has done their research and arrives at the buying moment informed about choices and prices. They are willing to pay only a small premium if any for a particular value add.
The new school customer wants only the product or service and little if any touch — no sales call, no layers of sales managers, no administration. They see no reason to pay for anything else.
Until your costs do go away, you have a Hobson’s choice of which customer you charge for the SG&A. You will chase away the new customer if the price has even a little SG&A in it and you upset your most valued current and historical customers if they have to pay all the freight. There is real danger in the transition to a majority of new school customers and retaining those who will pay for “value” as they see it. In some industries, the transition will be a tsunami once it starts.
SOLUTIONS: UNBUNDLED PRICING, ACTIVITY BASED COSTING, MARKETING DOMINATES AND SALES GOES AWAY
Imagine that you knew the cost of absolutely everything each customer received (product features, service features, touch, records, speed, whatever). Now imagine you could ultimately get your customers to give up what they wont pay for so each customer pays for only what they want and what they get (individualized prices). Some companies have been doing just this while treating a small base of best customers to a more gradual transition and a small premium based on trust, (customer’s) risk and cost of switching. And by shifting investment from sales to marketing (especially social media and internet marketing) to get in the “consideration set” of prospects.
That’s just my view. What’s yours?
For more on this key topic, visit:
Small Bsiness Advocate and get a copy of Jim Blasingame’s new book The Age of the Customer: Prepare for the Moment of Relevance makes this transition accessible to those with a modest understanding of technology and social media. I read it on a flight to California and am glad I invested the time.
Also check out the speeches, articles and such of R. Sam Bowers (firstname.lastname@example.org), a Vistage speaker and consultant.
If you are not already familiar with Vistage, the best CEO membership organization, also visit:
Sat, Jan 11, 2014
WHO WANTS TO KNOW?
At the last meeting of our Vistage CEO peer advisory board, one CEO asked for ideas for both becoming more informed about the culture in his organization and action he can take to cause positive change. It is the same question I have been asked by several private client CEOs. This note is based on both sources.
Organizational culture is defined in as many ways as there are people who think they understand it. Here is my view:
- Culture is what associates tell people at weekend gatherings about what it’s like to work at the organization
- Culture is the set of unwritten rules about behaviors for success (promotion, compensation, recognition) at the organization
- Culture is how we treat under-performers and those who once were contributors, what misbehavior we tolerate and why
- Culture is openness, sharing, engagement, collaboration, commitment, sacrifice for the common good, risk-taking, ethical behavior, protection of the firm’s reputation or lack (or opposite) of any or all of these in people’s daily choices
POINT OF VIEW OF THE COACH A FORMER MANAGEMENT CONSULTANT WHO FACILITATED SEVERAL CORPORATE TRANSFORMATIONS
Culture forms over time from both “signal acts” by the leadership and interpretations and self-protection by the grass roots.
Leaders are rarely in touch with how pervasive are the positive or negative behaviors in middle management and often at the front line.
Many leaders do less than the maximum to lead the culture.
ILLUSTRATIVE IDEAS FROM PRIVATE CLIENT WORK AND PEER ADVISORY WORK
- Make culture a priority of the CEO and the leadership team; set accountability for assessing change needed and leading it; speak about it often
- Recruit a talent manager whose job is every aspect of developing and retaining a bench of star players
- Conduct monthly CEO lunch ‘n learn with people at all levels selected randomly
- Have Town hall meetings about mission, values and culture
- Address culture first in strategy retreats
- Institute an employee opinion tool that probes attitude about cross-silo collaboration, beliefs about ethics, unwritten rules for success et al
LONGER LIST OF IDEAS
For a longer list of ideas, look for the attachment to my blog tomorrow. For even more, join the Vistage community at:
That’s just my view What’s yours?
If you find this helpful, please let me know and tell your friends. If you disagree, please tell me and leave a comment.
Thu, Dec 5, 2013
YOU ALREADY ARE AN EXPERT IN CULTURE, RIGHT?
It is no surprise to most leaders that culture matters. Yet in the pursuit of account wins and profits it seems to get lost repeatedly. Since no business can thrive that stays exactly the same, there is always change going on. And how the leader creates and nurtures the culture dictates whether the organization will change for the better and whether the change will be sustainable. Ignore culture at your peril.
WHAT WE MEAN BY CULTURE
It is probably worthwhile to establish some minimum of definitions before diving into actual stories. Culture is these items and more:
- The unwritten rules for success that govern people’s openness with each other, collaboration or silos and more
- The great behaviors that are encouraged and the toxic ones that are tolerated
- It is the spirit that motivates people to make sacrifices or not, whether aspirational or out and out fear
- Who is celebrated, rewarded and promoted all signal and reinforce the culture
- What questions the boss asks first and most often is not lost on people
- How people come and go (selection, on-boarding, dismissal)
- Who teaches and develops people so they grow
Even a team with a great culture within a company that has a not so great culture can outperform expectations. So culture is local as well as “national (company-wide).
And a warning: I have seen very tough bosses who demand the unreasonable establish a positive culture. It is NOT about being soft or touchy feely.
CASE HISTORIES OF TOXIC CULTURES
If every leader “gets” the importance of culture, why is it that:
- A family owned business with a great brand and national distribution loses so many of its best people, has people who tell new recruits they fell like prisoners and work under constant fear with no reward to excel? Where enormous energy is expended on attacking each other? This produces a substandard, uncompetitive workforce and often worsening financial results after awhile.
- A small company in the personnel business starves it of the capital it needs for computers and information systems, refuses to invest in new clients to get off on the right foot? Then blames the people for failing to achieve stretch goals?
- A potentially industry changing health care company just getting its technology to work and winning the trust of new clients is so micro-managed that people wait to be told what to do rather than take initiative?
These companies are good at shrinking their own well-being and financials.
CASE HISTORIES WHERE CULTURE PAYS OFF
By contrast, how is it that:
- A start-up with fewer than 10 employees does the work of 20 or 30 employees, works its way through crises and has at least 4 people who act as leaders at various times, depending on the situation. The founder and his almost co-founder treat the squad as a treasured team with high expectations all around and lead by example. Meetings, such as they are, accord everyone at the table respect for their input.
- A private equity firm is able to attract the best and brightest stars from bigger, more prestigious firms and win deals with ceos who could have their pick of financial sources? They are, simply stated, a better place to work and a better partner. And they are savvy and tough negotiators.
- A company doing $4mm grows to hundreds of millions in revenues and huge EBITDA and the CEO still conducts a monthly class on business himself, sometimes wearing a costume? Continually top-grades his direct reports without using fear as a motivator for performance? Recruits an outsider who is female as president and the entire senior team is enthralled and rallied rather than upset. Focuses the energy of everyone on delighting clients and beating the competition rather than on internal politics and infighting?
ANOTHER WARNING: TRANSPARENCY REIGNS
Your culture is visible to lots of people. What your people say about the company at the barbecue and other social occasions. What is evident from your communications of all sorts. And you have an alumni body no matter how small your company may be.
That’s just my view. What’s yours?
IF YOU WANT MORE ON THIS TOPIC, LISTEN IN TO JIM BLASINGAME’S DISCUSSION OF THIS TOPIC ON SMALL BUSINESS ADVOCATE RADIO SHOW. FIND HIM AT Small Business Advocate
Sun, Nov 3, 2013
THE IMPRESSION YOU MAKE
You make an impression on your boss every time you show up. What will she say about you afterward? What do you want her/him to say?
One of my C-suite clients asked me if there were a book to read on managing upward for direct reports of the CEO. If you know of a really good one, please let me know. There are two videos on Youtube that should stimulate your thinking. One is by Wilymanager:
The other is by leadership professor Todd Dewett:
THOUGHTS FROM A LEADERSHIP COACH
But the question set me to thinking. What would be the table of contents for such a book or pamphlet? Here is what I asked my client (only a starter set for discussion):
That’s just my view. What’s yours?
If you like this post, tell a friend. If not, tell me.
Mon, Sep 2, 2013
THE BOTTOM LINE
Questions can be more important than answers. Good CEOs know this. Among the questions: “What don’t I know that could kill me?” And “Am I pushing too hard or not hard enough?”
BUILT INTO MUSCLE MEMORY
It is NOT that they do it every day, just periodically. Good CEOs challenge their own assumptions and their own knowledge and routinely do it to others. They also imagine scenarios beyond those for which they are planning. “What if….” is a frequent question not only to test assumptions, strategy and plans but also how the organization may have to adapt in the face of change. And peeling the artichoke back until the heart is revealed by a series of “Why?” and “Why you believe that” questions.
The very best CEOs and business owners work hard to develop a culture where it is safe for all to ask such questions, even expected.
In 1988, Richard Neustadt and Ernest May wrote: “Thinking in Time, The Use of History for Decision-Makers.” I find it is timeless (no pun intended). Do I know all I could? How could I find out what i really need to know? Is the analogy in my head a good one or flawed? Let’s decide how to think about “this” before we decide “what to do about this.”
The book is still available on Amazon.com.
That’s just my view. What’s yours?
Tue, Aug 20, 2013
High Stakes Personnel Move By CEO
Even my best CEO clients forget that ten minutes prep for a phone call is just as important as prep for a meeting when there are high stakes. There is an art to concise prep.
This week, one of my long-standing clients sent me reading material in anticipation of a phone call about an imminent high stakes personnel move…two hours before the phone call. An earliler appointment cancelled, giving me a bit less than an hour to read the materials and prepare. All I needed was 20 minutes to ask myself what this was really about, write down a list of criteria for good and bad outcomes, organizational choices beside giving the person broad and sole line authority, a list of constituents affected by the choice and some ideas about key messages.
The client presented his view, then asked for my thoughts. I asked him to do in real time what I had done in prep. The conversation was at high speed and got to a good place in short order. When he decided we were done (before the alotted time was up), he said: “You are either incredibly quick or you came to the call fully prepared. I am focused on results but there is a way to get them with far less collateral damage.”
I told him how I had prepared and for how long. He took it as a reminder for himself. Just because it is a phone call does not mean it is any less important than an actual meeting.
That’s just my experience. What’s yours?